Oostlander, J., Güntert, S. T., van Schie, S. & Wehner, T.
استناداً إلى نظرية تقرير المصير، تُظهر الدراسة أن أسلوب القيادة الداعم للاستقلالية لدى منسّقي المتطوعين يزيد الدافعية الذاتية للمتطوعين ورضاهم عن عملهم.
The aim of the present study is to provide a deeper understanding of how autonomy-supportive leadership affects volunteer motivation by taking volunteers’ individual differences into account. For this purpose, self-determination theory (SDT) was utilized because this conceptual framework considers both the social context (i.e., autonomy-supportive leadership) and individual differences (i.e., causality orientations) as antecedents of motivation. Causality orientations alter the way individuals perceive their social context as either autonomy-supportive or controlling (i.e., autonomy orientation or control orientation, respectively). Therefore, it is hypothesized that both types of causality orientations serve as moderators of the relationship between autonomy-supportive leadership and volunteer motivation. The hypotheses were tested on N = 1,979 volunteers. The results revealed that the relationship between autonomy-supportive leadership and volunteer motivation varied as a function of the strength of autonomy and control orientation. The importance of the moderating role of individual differences on volunteer motivation is discussed.
المصدر: Crossref (بيانات DOI الوصفية) — الملخّص الأصلي الذي نشره المؤلفون.
استناداً إلى نظرية تقرير المصير، تُظهر الدراسة أن أسلوب القيادة الداعم للاستقلالية لدى منسّقي المتطوعين يزيد الدافعية الذاتية للمتطوعين ورضاهم عن عملهم.
هل أكملت هذا المحتوى؟